Explanation
A complex sentence contains a superordinate clause and at least one subordinate clause. Structural dependence matters, rather than length or punctuation alone. Subordinate clauses can serve different functions and contain further embeddings. In the context of hypotaxis, the term shows how one proposition incorporates another as a condition, reason or specification. Such structural hierarchies need not rank the information by importance. The German label is used here for subordination; extending the analysis to other languages requires appropriate structural criteria.
Movement of thought
1. Identify the clauses. 2. Determine dependencies. 3. Assign functions. 4. Check further embeddings. 5. Compare structure with informational importance.
Scientific use case
Text analysis can examine which relations are explicitly marked through subordination.
Example
“Mira stays because the train is cancelled” combines a superordinate clause with a subordinate reason clause.
Counterexample
“Mira stays and Nils leaves” contains multiple clauses but initially displays coordination.
Distinction
Distinguish subordination from coordination, sentence length and informational importance.
Effect on thought and perception
Complex sentences organise propositions through dependencies.
Resonance
One thought carries another within its own form.
Provenance
Parallel corpus 98f0950771ae4662f291d2f15f5c51b6797f3c20ba458a68615cdb177002ea18; case-bounded source review accepted; human specialist review not claimed.
Cite this entry
Reich, Michael (Hrsg./ed.): „Complex sentence“. Atlas der Sprache, AT-NAV-G05-001. ATLAS 259, data model 1.6.0. https://atlasoflanguage.com/concept/AT-NAV-G05-001The address remains stable; editorial content may evolve. Editorial reading state: 2026-10-15. Include your access date for precise references.