Explanation
Concessivity relates a state of affairs to another that would, under a relevant expectation, count against it. The expectation is not an exceptionless law. It may arise from general knowledge, local circumstances or previously stated assumptions. In “Although it is raining, we are going for a walk”, rain is invoked as a possible reason against the walk but overridden in this case. Analysis must identify the inferred expectation rather than merely search for a particular word. Not every use of but is concessive, and rhetorical concession does not always coincide with a grammatical concessive construction.
Movement of thought
1. Identify the related propositions. 2. Reconstruct a relevant expectation. 3. State the expected inference. 4. Test how this case defeats it. 5. Describe form and discourse function separately.
Scientific use case
Corpus research can compare concessive readings through explicit connectives and reconstructable expectations.
Example
“Although the task was difficult, Mira solved it quickly” relates an expectation about difficulty and completion time to an unexpected outcome.
Counterexample
“Lea is reading, but Nils is cooking” may express contrast without that same expectation structure.
Distinction
Distinguish concessivity from simple contrast, logical contradiction and rhetorical concession in general.
Effect on thought and perception
Concessivity marks an exception without necessarily abandoning the underlying expectation altogether.
Resonance
An objection remains audible, yet the sentence proceeds beyond it.
Provenance
Parallel source review reconciled 2026-10-07; human specialist review not claimed.
Cite this entry
Reich, Michael (Hrsg./ed.): „Concessivity“. Atlas der Sprache, AT-NAV-G03-048. ATLAS 259, data model 1.6.0. https://atlasoflanguage.com/concept/AT-NAV-G03-048The address remains stable; editorial content may evolve. Editorial reading state: 2026-10-15. Include your access date for precise references.