Explanation
A problematic transition from descriptions of what is to evaluations or claims about what ought to be. A grammatically smooth inference obscures the shift from factual description to normative validity.
Example
Atlas example: A grammatically smooth inference obscures the shift from factual description to normative validity.
Counterexample
Mere formal similarity without the relationship characteristic of the naturalistic fallacy.
Distinction
Distinguishing between what is and what ought to be: What is decisive in the naturalistic fallacy is the specific movement—a grammatically smooth inference obscures the shift from factual description to normative validity.
Effect on thought and perception
A grammatically seamless inference obscures the shift from factual description to normative validity.
Resonance
The naturalistic fallacy renders relationships perceptible as directed change: A grammatically smooth inference obscures the shift from factual description to normative validity.
Cite this entry
Reich, Michael (Hrsg./ed.): „Naturalistic fallacy“. Atlas der Sprache, AT-119-036. ATLAS 251, data model 1.6.0. https://atlasoflanguage.com/concept/AT-119-036The address remains stable; editorial content may evolve. A verified modification date per entry is not yet available. Include your access date for precise references.