Explanation
Morphological productivity concerns a pattern's availability for forming new words or forms. Many stored words following a pattern do not establish that speakers can freely extend it today. Conversely, a productive process may be infrequent because suitable occasions are rare. Productivity therefore differs from frequency, intelligibility and prescriptive acceptability. Blocking is a particular limiting case: an established competitor may discourage an expected innovation while the pattern remains available elsewhere. Analysis considers the pattern's domain, particular bases and competing forms together rather than inferring global unproductivity from one rejected example.
Movement of thought
1. Identify a formation pattern. 2. Collect existing types. 3. Test possible new bases. 4. Consider competing forms. 5. Assess frequency and extendibility separately.
Scientific use case
Corpus evidence of new types can be compared with controlled judgements of innovations.
Example
An experiment can pair an invented activity verb with a possible agent noun and test whether speakers extend the pattern to the new base.
Counterexample
A long list of historically formed words does not alone establish present-day productivity.
Distinction
Distinguish productivity from token frequency, regularity alone, acceptance of one word and blocking.
Effect on thought and perception
Productivity separates stored vocabulary from available extension.
Resonance
A pattern lives not only in existing results but in applications still possible.
Provenance
Parallel corpus 98f0950771ae4662f291d2f15f5c51b6797f3c20ba458a68615cdb177002ea18; case-bounded source review accepted; human specialist review not claimed.
Cite this entry
Reich, Michael (Hrsg./ed.): „Morphological productivity“. Atlas der Sprache, AT-NAV-G04-032. ATLAS 259, data model 1.6.0. https://atlasoflanguage.com/concept/AT-NAV-G04-032The address remains stable; editorial content may evolve. Editorial reading state: 2026-10-15. Include your access date for precise references.