Explanation
Cognition covers a broad range of capacities, including perception, memory, learning, thinking and problem-solving. Which processes belong to this range and how they should be explained depend on theoretical commitments. Cognition is not restricted to conscious reflection or verbally formulated rules. One disputed issue is how far bodily action and social or technological surroundings should count as constituents of cognitive processes. This entry introduces the research area without making internal symbol manipulation or a particular embodied account its sole definition. Specific investigations must identify both the capacity at issue and the intended level of explanation.
Movement of thought
1. Select an observable task. 2. Distinguish the capacities it requires. 3. Formulate an explanatory model. 4. Operationalise its predictions. 5. Compare findings with alternative accounts.
Scientific use case
A study can measure memory, gaze and use of aids separately and examine their interaction.
Example
Finding a familiar route may combine visual recognition, spatial memory and the use of a map.
Counterexample
An inability to explain a rule verbally does not by itself show that performance involves no cognition.
Distinction
Distinguish cognition from consciousness, intelligence, brain activity and any single theory of cognition.
Effect on thought and perception
The term connects research questions while requiring precise local scope.
Resonance
Orientation can emerge before a thought takes the form of a sentence.
Provenance
Parallel corpus 98f0950771ae4662f291d2f15f5c51b6797f3c20ba458a68615cdb177002ea18; case-bounded source review accepted; human specialist review not claimed.
Cite this entry
Reich, Michael (Hrsg./ed.): „Cognition“. Atlas der Sprache, AT-NAV-G03-034. ATLAS 259, data model 1.6.0. https://atlasoflanguage.com/concept/AT-NAV-G03-034The address remains stable; editorial content may evolve. Editorial reading state: 2026-10-15. Include your access date for precise references.