Explanation
Direct speech presents an utterance as belonging to a particular voice. Person and time expressions are ordinarily interpreted from the represented speaking situation. Quotation marks or a reporting clause may mark the shift, but are not required in every presentation. Apparent immediacy remains constructed: selection, placement and framing shape the voice. In fiction there need be no historical original at all. Documentary uses of direct speech likewise require separate evidence for verbal accuracy.
Movement of thought
1. Distinguish the frame from the represented voice. 2. Assign personal and temporal reference. 3. Examine selection and placement. 4. Assess claims of verbal accuracy separately.
Scientific use case
A textual analysis could compare direct and indirect versions of an invented utterance and describe changes in deixis and framing.
Example
In an invented dialogue, Mira says, “I will come tomorrow.” I and tomorrow belong to Mira’s represented speaking situation.
Counterexample
Quotation marks do not prove that anyone actually spoke those words.
Distinction
Distinguish indirect speech, free indirect discourse and documentary transcription. Sermocinatio and dialogismus can employ direct speech without being equivalent to it.
Effect on thought and perception
Direct speech can give a voice prominence; its effect depends on the frame.
Resonance
A voice steps forward, but the text has arranged its entrance.
Provenance
Parallel source review reconciled 2026-10-07; human specialist review not claimed.
Cite this entry
Reich, Michael (Hrsg./ed.): „Direct speech“. Atlas der Sprache, AT-NAV-G02-034. ATLAS 259, data model 1.6.0. https://atlasoflanguage.com/concept/AT-NAV-G02-034The address remains stable; editorial content may evolve. Editorial reading state: 2026-10-15. Include your access date for precise references.