Explanation
In syntactic analysis, transitivity often concerns a predicate's combination with a subject and an object. Semantic approaches instead examine a bundle of properties, such as participant number, affectedness and event character. These uses must remain explicit: a syntactically transitive clause need not describe a forceful action changing an object. Object marking and argument expression may also vary by construction. In connection with ergativity, incorporation and differential object marking, precise comparison criteria are therefore essential. Counting all complements or all people mentioned does not by itself provide a reliable transitivity analysis.
Movement of thought
1. Specify the analytical sense. 2. Identify core arguments. 3. Examine the construction. 4. Record semantic properties separately. 5. Compare alternations.
Scientific use case
Cross-linguistic research can record object marking independently of semantic affectedness.
Example
“Mira knows the route” is syntactically transitive although knowing does not change the route.
Counterexample
A location expression alongside a subject does not automatically make an intransitive verb transitive.
Distinction
Distinguish syntactic transitivity from semantic affectedness, valency in general and mere word count.
Effect on thought and perception
Transitivity connects argument structure with explicitly chosen comparison dimensions.
Resonance
Two participants do not always stand in the same kind of relation.
Provenance
Parallel corpus 98f0950771ae4662f291d2f15f5c51b6797f3c20ba458a68615cdb177002ea18; case-bounded source review accepted; human specialist review not claimed.
Cite this entry
Reich, Michael (Hrsg./ed.): „Transitivity“. Atlas der Sprache, AT-NAV-G05-026. ATLAS 259, data model 1.6.0. https://atlasoflanguage.com/concept/AT-NAV-G05-026The address remains stable; editorial content may evolve. Editorial reading state: 2026-10-15. Include your access date for precise references.