Explanation
A relative clause relates to an antecedent expression or, in a free relative, itself performs a corresponding nominal function. It may restrict referent selection or supply information about an already identified referent. These functions cannot be read directly from German comma punctuation. Introducers and word order also vary across languages. Free relatives matter particularly to pseudoclefts, while island constraints concern possibilities for syntactic dependencies out of such structures. This entry connects those origins without turning one German pattern into a universal definition.
Movement of thought
1. Delimit the possible relative clause. 2. Identify an antecedent or free nominal function. 3. Test its interpretive contribution. 4. Describe language-specific marking. 5. Investigate dependencies through appropriate contrasts.
Scientific use case
Syntax and semantics can compare restrictive, appositive and free relatives using several diagnostics.
Example
“The book that Mira is reading is here” relates a clause to book. In “What Mira is reading surprises me”, a free relative can occupy the subject position.
Counterexample
Not every clause beginning with what is relative; embedded questions can look similar.
Distinction
Distinguish relative clauses from embedded questions, single-word modifiers and every similarly introduced construction.
Effect on thought and perception
Relative clauses connect reference with further specification.
Resonance
An object is named and receives a small clausal space of its own.
Provenance
Parallel corpus 98f0950771ae4662f291d2f15f5c51b6797f3c20ba458a68615cdb177002ea18; case-bounded source review accepted; human specialist review not claimed.
Cite this entry
Reich, Michael (Hrsg./ed.): „Relative clause“. Atlas der Sprache, AT-NAV-G04-047. ATLAS 259, data model 1.6.0. https://atlasoflanguage.com/concept/AT-NAV-G04-047The address remains stable; editorial content may evolve. Editorial reading state: 2026-10-15. Include your access date for precise references.