Explanation
Isogram is used here in the broader wordplay sense of an expression in which every occurring letter appears equally often. The frequency must be specified. When each occurs once, the result matches the source entry's heterogram definition; narrower uses restrict isogram to that case. Counting also requires prior conventions: are case differences ignored, spaces removed or accented letters normalised? A fixed procedure turns an impression of unusual letter distribution into a testable property. This entry does not claim uniform terminology across wordplay traditions.
Movement of thought
1. Specify the expression. 2. State normalisation conventions. 3. Count each letter. 4. Compare the frequencies. 5. Classify the expression with its order n stated.
Scientific use case
A small program can reproduce the counts, provided the normalisation rules are preserved with the result.
Example
Normalising case turns “Mama” into mama: m and a each occur twice. Under the broader convention adopted here, it is a second-order isogram.
Counterexample
Mamma contains three instances of m and two of a, so it fails the equal-frequency rule.
Distinction
Distinguish the broader definition, first-order isograms and the source entry's heterogram convention.
Effect on thought and perception
The constraint reveals linguistic material as a discrete arrangement.
Resonance
Alongside meaning, words display another order made of recurrence and distribution.
Provenance
Parallel source review reconciled 2026-10-07; human specialist review not claimed.
Cite this entry
Reich, Michael (Hrsg./ed.): „Isogram“. Atlas der Sprache, AT-NAV-G03-029. ATLAS 259, data model 1.6.0. https://atlasoflanguage.com/concept/AT-NAV-G03-029The address remains stable; editorial content may evolve. Editorial reading state: 2026-10-15. Include your access date for precise references.