Explanation
This is a descriptive English label for the selected German linguistic sense of Historismus, not a claim that Historicism has that sense. English dictionaries may label a sense historical or explain its former referent in the definition. Norri (2022) documents variation in these practices.
Movement of thought
1. Identify the historical referent and the word’s present use separately. 2. Ask whether the referent is former or the expression old-fashioned. 3. State the lexicographical convention used in making the distinction.
Scientific use case
Lexicographical analysis distinguishes temporal usage labels from the dating of the referent.
Example
Original comparison: “Warming pan” can name a former household object; “raiment” can sound old-fashioned while referring to clothing that still exists.
Counterexample
An obsolete synonym for an everyday object does not automatically belong to the same category.
Distinction
Historical reference and obsolete expression are different dimensions. Terminological boundaries vary; the philosophical doctrine of historicism is outside this profile.
Effect on thought and perception
The reader separates the history of a referent from the currency of an expression.
Resonance
A current expression can preserve access to an earlier way of living.
Provenance
Accepted editorial clarification, 15 October 2026, packages D01–D11; original canonical evidence retained separately.
Cite this entry
Reich, Michael (Hrsg./ed.): „Historical-realia word“. Atlas der Sprache, AT-NAV-G03-021. ATLAS 259, data model 1.6.0. https://atlasoflanguage.com/concept/AT-NAV-G03-021The address remains stable; editorial content may evolve. Editorial reading state: 2026-10-15. Include your access date for precise references.
Source-specific historical context · editorial revision
This history concerns lexicology, not the philosophical doctrine. Lukas (2022, p. 75, note 11) discusses disputed boundaries with archaisms; Norri (2022) investigates temporal labels in English dictionaries.
Status of this clarification
Editorially accepted on 15 October 2026. The sources and limitations named in the profile support this reading. A superseded conflicting profile is not displayed as an additional current explanation; the original evidence remains archived unchanged. This does not assert a new first attestation or exhaustive verification.