Explanation
Dependency is a directed syntactic relation between a head and a dependent. It describes structure rather than mere adjacency. A dependency analysis identifies relations such as subject, object or modification. Decisions about heads partly depend on the analytical framework. Dependency marking answers a different question: where is the relation overtly expressed? Marking can occur on the head, the dependent, both or neither. Absence of morphological marking does not remove the syntactic relation.
Movement of thought
1. Delimit the units involved. 2. Identify the head using stated criteria. 3. Name the relation. 4. Locate its morphological marking independently.
Scientific use case
A treebank could be checked for consistent head choices and separately for the marking of grammatical relations.
Example
In “Mira reads letters”, letters can be analysed as the object of reads. A dependency arrow represents that relation, not the temporal course of reading.
Counterexample
Adjacent words need not stand in a direct dependency relation. Some representations of coordination are framework conventions.
Distinction
Distinguish linear adjacency, semantic causation and marking location. Annotation conventions and theoretical analysis do not wholly coincide.
Effect on thought and perception
Dependency analysis exposes relations that a word list leaves unspecified.
Resonance
Words do more than follow one another; they hold one another within a structure.
Provenance
Parallel source review reconciled 2026-10-07; human specialist review not claimed.
Cite this entry
Reich, Michael (Hrsg./ed.): „Dependency“. Atlas der Sprache, AT-NAV-G02-031. ATLAS 259, data model 1.6.0. https://atlasoflanguage.com/concept/AT-NAV-G02-031The address remains stable; editorial content may evolve. Editorial reading state: 2026-10-15. Include your access date for precise references.