Explanation
An argument connects one or more premises to a conclusion they are offered to support. In ordinary usage, “an argument” may also mean a single reason; analysis must specify its unit. Textual order does not determine inferential roles: a conclusion may come first, and reasons may remain unstated. Whether the connection succeeds is a further question. The term initially identifies a justificatory structure, not necessarily a sound or persuasive one.
Movement of thought
1. Identify the claim to be supported. 2. Collect the offered reasons. 3. Carefully reconstruct unstated assumptions. 4. Represent the claimed support relation. 5. Then evaluate quality and contextual adequacy.
Scientific use case
Argument analysis can segment discourse into support structures, expose assumptions and compare competing reconstructions.
Example
“We should open earlier: visitors regularly wait before eight, and we want to reduce waiting.” An observation and a goal jointly support a recommendation.
Counterexample
“We open at eight, and the wall is blue” is not an argument without a further connection. Adding “therefore” does not establish adequate support.
Distinction
Distinguish quarrelling, isolated assertion and a grammatical argument selected by a predicate. In Peirce's semiotics, an argument or delome is a sign type representing a rule-governed inferential relation; the originating link from Dicent concerns this specialised classification.
Effect on thought and perception
A claim becomes a position for which reasons can be requested.
Resonance
Assent is invited to rest on something another person can inspect.
Provenance
Parallel source review reconciled 2026-10-07; human specialist review not claimed.
Cite this entry
Reich, Michael (Hrsg./ed.): „Argument“. Atlas der Sprache, AT-NAV-G01-023. ATLAS 259, data model 1.6.0. https://atlasoflanguage.com/concept/AT-NAV-G01-023The address remains stable; editorial content may evolve. Editorial reading state: 2026-10-15. Include your access date for precise references.