Explanation
Alienable and inalienable possession are not a natural universal binary; languages classify bodies, kin and objects differently.
Example
Navajo distinguishes a woman's own milk from milk she owns; Acoma distinguishes an animal's horn from a horn owned by a person.
Counterexample
My inalienable house does not establish a grammatical alienability class.
Distinction
inherent belonging ↔ transferable possession
Effect on thought and perception
Shows whether possession is framed as control or as a constitutive relation.
Resonance
Belonging gains layers between body, relationship and disposal.
Cite this entry
Reich, Michael (Hrsg./ed.): „Alienability“. Atlas der Sprache, AT-145-003. ATLAS 251, data model 1.6.0. https://atlasoflanguage.com/concept/AT-145-003The address remains stable; editorial content may evolve. A verified modification date per entry is not yet available. Include your access date for precise references.