Explanation
Cataplexis argues not primarily from the merit of a decision but from the expected consequence of disobedience. It shifts attention from reasons to the power that announces or can inflict a sanction. A warning becomes cataplexis when the threatened consequence functions as pressure.
Example
If you remove the source reference, the profile will not be approved. The announced consequence is meant to prevent the action.
Counterexample
Without a source reference, the claim cannot later be checked reliably. This gives a consequential reason, not a threat of punishment or disaster.
Distinction
Unlike protrope or admonitio, which may warn protectively, cataplexis deploys the threatened consequence as coercion or intimidation. Its distinction from argumentum ad baculum is taxonomic rather than necessarily practical.
Effect on thought and perception
Narrows the perceived field of choice and exposes the distribution of power behind an utterance.
Resonance
A possible path is occupied by a projected shadow; before anything happens, the announced consequence acts backwards on the present.
Cite this entry
Reich, Michael (Hrsg./ed.): „Cataplexis“. Atlas der Sprache, AT-RHE-206-002. ATLAS 251, data model 1.6.0. https://atlasoflanguage.com/concept/AT-RHE-206-002The address remains stable; editorial content may evolve. A verified modification date per entry is not yet available. Include your access date for precise references.