Explanation
Representation is a relationship in which something stands for something else or makes it accessible in a particular format. Its conditions depend on theory and domain. A picture, linguistic expression and posited mental structure need not represent by the same mechanism. Resemblance alone is not generally sufficient: two objects may resemble each other without either depicting the other. Representations can also be incomplete or false. In the intentionality context, analysis must therefore ask how a representational model explains mental directedness rather than assume the explanation merely by naming it.
Movement of thought
1. Distinguish representation from represented object. 2. Describe the format. 3. Justify the relationship supporting representation. 4. Examine errors and boundary cases. 5. Separate explanation from presupposition.
Scientific use case
Model comparison can examine which information a representation preserves, changes or omits.
Example
A route map deliberately distorts distances while reliably representing the order of stops.
Counterexample
Two similarly shaped stones do not represent one another merely through resemblance.
Distinction
Distinguish representation from copying, resemblance, guaranteed truth and one exclusive theory of mental states.
Effect on thought and perception
The concept makes mediation and its limits available for analysis.
Resonance
Something becomes present without being present in the same form itself.
Provenance
Parallel corpus 98f0950771ae4662f291d2f15f5c51b6797f3c20ba458a68615cdb177002ea18; case-bounded source review accepted; human specialist review not claimed.
Cite this entry
Reich, Michael (Hrsg./ed.): „Representation“. Atlas der Sprache, AT-NAV-G04-049. ATLAS 259, data model 1.6.0. https://atlasoflanguage.com/concept/AT-NAV-G04-049The address remains stable; editorial content may evolve. Editorial reading state: 2026-10-15. Include your access date for precise references.