Explanation
Working memory concerns the temporary availability and processing of information for an ongoing task. In language comprehension, earlier parts of a sentence must remain accessible for later dependencies. This is more than a container that holds words up to a fixed limit. Models differ in how maintenance, attention and retrieval interact. In the originating context of agreement attraction, competition between similar features during retrieval is particularly relevant. An error, or reduced disruption from an erroneous sentence, cannot simply be read as evidence of low storage capacity.
Movement of thought
1. Identify the linguistic dependency. 2. Specify the earlier information needed. 3. Identify potentially competing cues. 4. Separate assumptions about storage, retrieval and attention.
Scientific use case
A controlled experiment could vary the number of the subject and a distractor independently, measuring reading times and judgements.
Example
Constructed: In “The report about the journeys is ready”, is must relate to report. Plural journeys provides a competing number cue.
Counterexample
A single agreement error does not establish a person’s general memory ability.
Distinction
Distinguish working memory from simple short-term storage, long-term knowledge and intelligence; attraction is not a capacity diagnosis.
Effect on thought and perception
A retrieval perspective can help explain why structurally inappropriate information nevertheless affects processing.
Resonance
What was just said remains an accessible trace as the sentence continues to grow.
Provenance
Parallel source review reconciled 2026-10-07; human specialist review not claimed.
Cite this entry
Reich, Michael (Hrsg./ed.): „Working memory“. Atlas der Sprache, AT-NAV-G02-011. ATLAS 259, data model 1.6.0. https://atlasoflanguage.com/concept/AT-NAV-G02-011The address remains stable; editorial content may evolve. Editorial reading state: 2026-10-15. Include your access date for precise references.