Explanation
A figurative term for language perceived as damaged, ideologically burdened or tentatively renewed after historical catastrophe. Transfers material destruction onto words and syntax and asks whether burdened language can be reused, cleansed or reassembled.
Example
After 1945, words associated with Nazi language were avoided, examined or turned against their former use.
Counterexample
A mere label without the described formal, cultural or conceptual movement.
Distinction
Distinguish from NS-Sprache; the neighbour remains connected as a crossway.
Effect on thought and perception
Transfers material destruction onto words and syntax and asks whether burdened language can be reused, cleansed or reassembled.
Resonance
Transfers material destruction onto words and syntax and asks whether burdened language can be reused, cleansed or reassembled.
Cite this entry
Reich, Michael (Hrsg./ed.): „Language of the ruins“. Atlas der Sprache, AT-DEP6-0017. ATLAS 251, data model 1.6.0. https://atlasoflanguage.com/concept/AT-DEP6-0017The address remains stable; editorial content may evolve. A verified modification date per entry is not yet available. Include your access date for precise references.