Explanation
The view that meaning is essentially determined by the role of an expression in inferential relationships. To understand a term is to master its legitimate connections to reasons, consequences, and contradictions.
Example
Anyone who has mastered the concept of “bachelor” accepts the inference to “unmarried.”
Counterexample
A mere visual association does not determine inferential meaning.
Distinction
Distinction from the postulate of meaning: A mere visual association does not determine inferential meaning.
Effect on thought and perception
To understand a concept is to master its justified transitions to reasons, consequences, and contradictions.
Resonance
Inferentialism makes a directed relationship perceptible: To understand a concept is to master its valid transitions to reasons, consequences, and contradictions.
Cite this entry
Reich, Michael (Hrsg./ed.): „Inferentialism“. Atlas der Sprache, AT-134-032. ATLAS 251, data model 1.6.0. https://atlasoflanguage.com/concept/AT-134-032The address remains stable; editorial content may evolve. A verified modification date per entry is not yet available. Include your access date for precise references.