Contextual explanation · NAV-G05-052
Similarity
This explanation addresses the term in its originating context. It is not an additional canonical Atlas profile.
Explanation
Similarity relates objects or cases that agree in specified respects without needing to be identical. Which respects matter and how they are weighted depend on the question. In family resemblance, overlapping similarities can connect a group without one feature being shared by every member. This entails neither that any arbitrary collection forms a justified category nor that similarity is automatically transitive. Analysis must state comparison dimensions, counterexamples and purpose. A superficial resemblance may matter for one question and mislead for another.
Movement of thought
1. Identify the items compared. 2. Specify relevant respects. 3. Weight shared properties. 4. Examine differences. 5. Test the scope of grouping.
Example
Three games may share equipment, rules or competition pairwise without exactly the same feature connecting all three.
Counter-test
If A resembles B and B resembles C, A need not resemble C in the relevant respect.
Scientific use case
Conceptual analysis can investigate which comparisons actually sustain a category.
Effect
Similarity enables connection without complete identity.
Resonance
Closeness can arise from different stretches of shared ground.
Distinction
Distinguish similarity from identity, necessary transitivity and a universal shared essence.
Sources
- EN:tversky-similarity-abstractdocumented-source-register
- F06CEN:similarityspecified-passages-read
- Amos Tversky, Features of Similarity (1977; collected-writings reprint)
PDF pages 1–4, printed reprint pages 7–10; retrieved lines 0–127
specified-passages-read - Ludwig Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations §§65–69, original-text column in Lois Shawver's annotated web edition
Original-text column, §§65–69; especially 66–67 (retrieved lines 14–29,49–56)
specified-passages-read