Contextual explanation · NAV-G05-032
Irregularity
This explanation addresses the term in its originating context. It is not an additional canonical Atlas profile.
Explanation
Irregularity here is a form's departure from a productive or expected formation pattern in a specified domain. It is relative to a stated rule, not the absence of all structure. Irregular forms may display recurring subgroup patterns and be highly familiar to experienced speakers. In the context of suppletion, suppletion is a particular kind of difference within a paradigm; not every irregular inflection is suppletive. Spelling variation, rarity and grammatical error are also distinct categories. Analysis must identify the comparison pattern and document actual usage.
Movement of thought
1. Specify the comparison pattern. 2. Record the paradigm. 3. Locate the departure. 4. Seek subgroup regularities. 5. Test suppletion separately.
Example
German singen – sang (“sing – sang”) departs from weak past-tense formation but participates in a recognisable ablaut pattern.
Counter-test
Frequency alone does not make a form regular, nor does rarity alone make it irregular.
Scientific use case
Morphological research can compare productivity with lexically stored alternations.
Effect
The concept describes a form's relationship to a particular pattern.
Resonance
An exception can belong to another order.
Distinction
Distinguish irregularity from structurelessness, error, rarity and suppletion in general.
Sources
- IDS grammis: Starke Verben
Opening and Variation zwischen schwachen und starken Formen; lines 60–75
specified-passages-read - John Mansfield: Morphology (2024), version 1
Core concepts; Questions, controversies, and new developments; lines 38–79
specified-passages-read - EN:oecs-morphologydocumented-source-register
- Catherine Anderson: Inflectional Morphology
242–251
specified-passages-read - IDS: Starke Verben
59–75,272–289
specified-passages-read