Contextual explanation · NAV-G04-052
Clarification request
This explanation addresses the term in its originating context. It is not an additional canonical Atlas profile.
Explanation
A clarification request seeks additional understanding of a preceding contribution. It may check a heard word, identify a referent or ask about an intended connection. In conversation analysis, such a request can initiate repair of another speaker's contribution: a recipient signals trouble and the original speaker subsequently explains or corrects. Not every clarification request produces a correction, however, and not every repair starts with a question. Sequential position and function matter. The same interrogative form can elsewhere express interest, disagreement or a request for new information.
Movement of thought
1. Identify the preceding contribution. 2. Locate the possible trouble source. 3. Describe the request's function. 4. Examine the following response. 5. Separate clarification, disagreement and topic initiation.
Example
“Mira is coming on Friday” followed by “This Friday?” may clarify temporal reference without treating the original statement as false.
Counter-test
“How are you?” is not a repair initiation without a relevant preceding trouble source.
Scientific use case
Conversation analysis can compare open and targeted clarification requests and their subsequent answers.
Effect
Clarification requests make understanding a jointly manageable task.
Resonance
A small step backwards may make the shared route dependable.
Distinction
Distinguish clarification requests from questions generally, rejection, self-repair and necessarily correcting an error.
Sources
- Dingemanse et al. (2015): Universal Principles in the Repair of Communication Problems
Repair initiation types and operations, lines244–254
documented-source-register - EN:repair-original-abstractdocumented-source-register