ATLAS OF LANGUAGE

Contextual explanation · NAV-G02-053

Feedback

This explanation addresses the term in its originating context. It is not an additional canonical Atlas profile.

Explanation

In this link, feedback means observable responses in conversation. Brief words, vocalisations or gestures can indicate receipt, encourage continuation or express a stance. These functions must be distinguished: receipt, a display of understanding and agreement are not the same. Attribution depends on position, prosody and subsequent talk. A nod gives no direct access to the listener’s internal state. Backchannels are one relevant area of such responses; the broader feedback category may also include extended replies and repair.

Movement of thought

1. Locate a response in the unfolding conversation. 2. Describe its form and prosody. 3. Check receipt, understanding and stance separately. 4. Consider the subsequent reaction. 5. Document remaining ambiguity.

Example

Mira describes a route. Jan says “mm-hm”, and Mira continues. The constructed example is compatible with a continuer function, but proves neither full understanding nor agreement.

Counter-test

“Yes” without context is no certain evidence of agreement. An extended objection is feedback, but not merely a brief backchannel signal.

Scientific use case

Conversation analysis can annotate response events separately from perceived agreement; paraphrases and repair sequences supply further evidence concerning understanding.

Effect

Responses can influence subsequent talk; their effect must be examined in the particular sequence.

Resonance

A small response changes the space in which the next utterance becomes possible.

Distinction

Distinguish technical feedback loops, simple agreement, actual understanding and speaker change. An observable form guarantees no single function.

Sources