ATLAS OF LANGUAGE

ATLAS 259 · comparison pilot

Read concepts comparatively

Compare up to four Atlas concepts through the same scholarly fields. The comparison creates no new interpretation; it only rearranges published profile fields.

Choose two to four concepts

Selected concepts

AT-RHE-0002 · Rhetorik/Stilistik

Metaphor

A transfer that makes one domain of experience intelligible through another.

Open full profile →
AT-RHE-W0001 · Rhetorik/Stilistik

Allegory

A sustained configuration in which persons, actions, or settings carry a second structured field of meaning.

Open full profile →
AT-W3-0274 · Semiotik/Zeichen

Symbol

A sign whose meaning arises primarily through conventional use.

Open full profile →

Movement of thought

AT-RHE-0002 · Rhetorik/Stilistik

Metaphor

  1. A difficult or abstract target calls for a perceptible form.
  2. A second, more familiar domain supplies images and relations.
  3. Selected structures are projected while others are excluded.
  4. The projection enables new inferences and simultaneously creates a blind spot.
  5. Returning to the target reveals that it is now perceived as differently organised.
AT-RHE-W0001 · Rhetorik/Stilistik

Allegory

  1. A concrete world of figures, objects, spaces, or events is first constructed as a coherent representation.
  2. Recurring correspondences open behind these elements a second, more abstract or culturally coded domain.
  3. Readers move between the levels and examine how local relations sustain a larger interpretive pattern.
  4. A counter-test asks whether mappings are textually supported, sustained, and still open to tension and surplus.
  5. The represented world returns as a double landscape in which sensory action and conceptual order interpret each other.
AT-W3-0274 · Semiotik/Zeichen

Symbol

  1. A perceptible form emerges as a possible carrier of meaning.
  2. A community connects it with an object or concept through repeated use or rule.
  3. Participants recognise the conventional relation and act upon it.
  4. Historical change and competing communities test the assignment's stability and limits.
  5. The sign returns as a material node in a shared but alterable semantic order.

In-depth explanation

AT-RHE-0002 · Rhetorik/Stilistik

Metaphor

A metaphor makes one domain appear in the light of another. It is not simply the replacement of an ordinary word by a more decorative one. Properties, relations, and possible inferences from one domain are projected onto the other: when an idea “germinates”, it acquires growth, duration, cultivation, and the possibility of withering. Every metaphor therefore highlights some aspects while suppressing others. It may occur as a single phrase or organise an entire argument or worldview. Its cognitive force lies not in complete identity but in a productive and necessarily limited transfer.

AT-RHE-W0001 · Rhetorik/Stilistik

Allegory

Allegory develops a concrete representation whose elements continuously point towards a second, more abstract domain of meaning. Unlike a local metaphor, it forms a system: figures, actions, spaces, or objects cohere within the represented world while also making a political, moral, religious, or epistemic order legible. The levels need not be connected by a rigid one-to-one key; productive allegories generate surplus, tension, and historically changing interpretation. Their power lies in making abstractions navigable and memorable. Their danger lies in treating the sensory world as disposable wrapping or imposing one authoritative reading on an open work.

AT-W3-0274 · Semiotik/Zeichen

Symbol

A symbol is a sign whose relation to its object arises substantially through shared use, rule, or cultural convention. A white flag may indicate surrender because a community has learned to interpret it that way; its visible form neither resembles the action nor necessarily results from it causally. Symbols are not therefore arbitrary in everyday operation. History, institutions, and repeated practice stabilise meanings, while new contexts may transform or contest them. One sign can also combine symbolic, iconic, and indexical dimensions. The concept leads from material form into a shared order of understanding and reveals how convention can make absent, abstract, and collectively valid meanings present for coordinated interpretation and action.

Example

AT-RHE-0002 · Rhetorik/Stilistik

Metaphor

“This objection breaks the frame of the debate.” The spatial model of a frame organises what counts as relevant inside the debate and what is placed outside it.

AT-RHE-W0001 · Rhetorik/Stilistik

Allegory

An archive appears as a city with open squares, sealed houses, and paths that change after every reading. The narrative world continually points to access, protection, and living memory.

AT-W3-0274 · Semiotik/Zeichen

Symbol

A white flag is understood in conflict as indicating surrender or willingness to negotiate. Its effect depends upon participants sharing the relevant convention.

Distinction

AT-RHE-0002 · Rhetorik/Stilistik

Metaphor

Distinguish metaphor from simile, metonymy, and allegory. Simile marks likeness explicitly; metonymy shifts within a factual association; allegory may sustain an extended and systematically interpretable figurative level.

AT-RHE-W0001 · Rhetorik/Stilistik

Allegory

Distinguish allegory from metaphor, symbol, parable, personification, and allegoresis. Allegory is the designed double representation; allegoresis is the act of interpreting a text allegorically.

AT-W3-0274 · Semiotik/Zeichen

Symbol

Distinguish symbols from icons, indices, emblems, and signals alone. Icons signify through resemblance and indices through actual connection; symbols depend primarily on learned and socially stabilised association.

Effect on thought and perception

AT-RHE-0002 · Rhetorik/Stilistik

Metaphor

Metaphors condense experience, guide inference, and can embed prior decisions within apparently self-evident images.

AT-RHE-W0001 · Rhetorik/Stilistik

Allegory

Allegory makes abstract relations spatially and narratively experienceable, strengthening memory and interpretive depth, but it may force complexity into an apparently closed code.

AT-W3-0274 · Semiotik/Zeichen

Symbol

Symbols make abstract and collective meanings manageable in perceptible forms and coordinate action through shared conventions.

Resonance

AT-RHE-0002 · Rhetorik/Stilistik

Metaphor

Two semantic fields remain distinct and begin to work upon one another precisely through their incomplete correspondence.
AT-RHE-W0001 · Rhetorik/Stilistik

Allegory

A visible action continually sends lines into a second semantic space; the two landscapes answer one another without fully merging.
AT-W3-0274 · Semiotik/Zeichen

Symbol

A visible form calls up an invisible order; its meaning lives through a community's repeated responses and changes with that reverberation.

Connections within this selection

AT-RHE-0002 · Rhetorik/Stilistik

Metaphor

No direct connection within this selection is recorded in the canonical relation set.

AT-W3-0274 · Semiotik/Zeichen

Symbol

No direct connection within this selection is recorded in the canonical relation set.

Scholarly boundary

This page compares existing Atlas profiles. Similarity in individual fields does not establish historical dependence, conceptual identity or cultural equivalence. The complete profiles, their sources and the canonical relations remain authoritative.