MICHAEL REICH
Atlas of Language
Auf Deutsch lesen

Public research edition · ATLAS 260

Who may speak, and who is heard?

Linguistic forms can enable access, set expectations and distribute recognition. These stations invite a distinction between power, authority and register in concrete conversations.

← Public research edition

Versioned research edition. No DOI or external archival deposit is documented.

Version
atlas-260-20261017-04
Prepared
2026-10-17
Responsible editor
Michael Reich
Source release
15.9.1 · ATLAS 260
Checkpoint
atlas-260-expansion15c-20261016-checkpoint
SHA-256
23631d986dbc3b59566207aa65c36a7567ec0fbc63cce07dc5a5a871f17f07ab
File size
65,917 Bytes
Canonical manifest SHA-256
8b36a386dbea6c48bbeb3fefe730c2128333a06e5ad847521e673a3bfbe82f92
Source base commit
36fc9bafd1ba0e1980ddd47aed4a3e9882001459

Download unchanged theme package as JSON · Manifest

Which linguistic conditions make reasoned disagreement possible?

Case study

Fictional exercise written for this material. Not empirical data.

An imagined association board plans new opening hours. The chair says: “The experts recommend this, so we all agree.” Two new members remain silent. One member asks about the evidence and requests an explanation without administrative jargon.

Station 1

Power

The capacity to shape the actions, interpretations, rules, or possibilities of others.

Look for possibilities for action and their limits. Start from an observable situation.

Who can determine the topic or speaking time in an imagined meeting?
Sources and references (2)
  • W02 · Metzler Lexikon Sprache · PDF-Seiten 8, 53, 63, 66, 76 · Volltext-/Artikelabgleich
    Show scope of evidence

    Offenes Beziehungsnetz → zweiter Grundbegriffscheck → Metzler/HWRh-Abgleich → ATLAS_239

  • W03.1 · Historisches Wörterbuch der Rhetorik, Band 1 · PDF-Seiten 8, 11, 12, 13, 15 · Volltext-/Artikelabgleich
    Show scope of evidence

    Offenes Beziehungsnetz → zweiter Grundbegriffscheck → Metzler/HWRh-Abgleich → ATLAS_239

Examine the full profile and its sources

Sources and references

  • W02 · Metzler Lexikon Sprache · PDF-Seiten 8, 53, 63, 66, 76 · Volltext-/Artikelabgleich
  • W03.1 · Historisches Wörterbuch der Rhetorik, Band 1 · PDF-Seiten 8, 11, 12, 13, 15 · Volltext-/Artikelabgleich

Full profile and scope of evidence: https://atlasoflanguage.com/concept/AT-CORE-239-035

Current full profile (may have changed)

Station 2

Authority

Recognised power of validity or decision held by a person, institution, tradition, or source.

Distinguish recognition from mere enforcement. Reasons for competence can be disclosed and challenged.

Which question tests expert advice without dismissing expertise wholesale?
Sources and references (2)
  • W02 · Metzler Lexikon Sprache · PDF-Seiten 76 · Volltext-/Artikelabgleich
    Show scope of evidence

    Offenes Beziehungsnetz → zweiter Grundbegriffscheck → Metzler/HWRh-Abgleich → ATLAS_239

  • W03.1 · Historisches Wörterbuch der Rhetorik, Band 1 · PDF-Seiten 75, 99, 101, 167, 179 · Volltext-/Artikelabgleich
    Show scope of evidence

    Offenes Beziehungsnetz → zweiter Grundbegriffscheck → Metzler/HWRh-Abgleich → ATLAS_239

Examine the full profile and its sources

Sources and references

  • W02 · Metzler Lexikon Sprache · PDF-Seiten 76 · Volltext-/Artikelabgleich
  • W03.1 · Historisches Wörterbuch der Rhetorik, Band 1 · PDF-Seiten 75, 99, 101, 167, 179 · Volltext-/Artikelabgleich

Full profile and scope of evidence: https://atlasoflanguage.com/concept/AT-CORE-239-006

Current full profile (may have changed)

Station 3

Register

A situation-dependent variety with typical linguistic forms and norms of usage.

Compare two ways of phrasing the same request. Register belongs to the situation, not to a person’s unchanging worth.

Which phrasing helps a new group member participate?
Sources and references (1)
  • ATLAS_091 · Fachquellenzuordnung offen

Examine the full profile and its sources

Sources and references

  • ATLAS_091 · Fachquellenzuordnung offen

Full profile and scope of evidence: https://atlasoflanguage.com/concept/AT-091-056

Current full profile (may have changed)

Station 4

Consensus

Consensus is shared acceptance of a judgement or course of action, whose object, extent and conditions must be specified rather than assumed.

Examine how agreement arises and how it can be questioned again.

Which rule prevents silence from automatically counting as consent?
Sources and references (4)
  • Historisches Wörterbuch der Rhetorik, Bd. 4, Artikel „Konsens“; hg. von Gert Ueding, Tübingen: Max Niemeyer 1998. Sp. 1256–1258; PDF-Seiten 634–635
    Show scope of evidence

    Definition sowie Unterscheidungen von Gültigkeitskonsens und Interessenkompromiss. Die systematischen Positionen der Autoren werden nicht als alleinige Bedeutung des Wortes ausgegeben. | Original Atlas applications remain separate.

  • Merriam-Webster: consensus
    Show scope of evidence

    Lexikalischer Beleg und Wortgeschichte des englischen Lemmas, keine vollständige Disziplingeschichte und keine automatische Übertragung auf deutsche Erstbelege. | Original Atlas applications remain separate.

  • Duden online: Konsens
    Show scope of evidence

    Knappe deutsche Bedeutungs- und Herkunftsstütze, keine neue historische Erstbelegprüfung. | Original Atlas applications remain separate.

  • Atlas der Sprache: Vergleichsstand Release 15.8.0 / Sites 352
    Show scope of evidence

    Arbeitsbasis des zuletzt in diesem Chat veröffentlichten Stands, keine neue vollständige Produktivinventur und kein unabhängiger wissenschaftlicher Beleg. | Original Atlas applications remain separate.

Examine the full profile and its sources

Sources and references

  • Historisches Wörterbuch der Rhetorik, Bd. 4, Artikel „Konsens“; hg. von Gert Ueding, Tübingen: Max Niemeyer 1998. Sp. 1256–1258; PDF-Seiten 634–635
  • Merriam-Webster: consensus · https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/consensus
  • Duden online: Konsens · https://www.duden.de/rechtschreibung/Konsens
  • Atlas der Sprache: Vergleichsstand Release 15.8.0 / Sites 352

Full profile and scope of evidence: https://atlasoflanguage.com/concept/AT-ADD-20261016-0009

Current full profile (may have changed)

Research boundary

A single expression does not establish a power structure. Situated usage, institutional rules and participants’ perspectives require separate investigation.

Fixed learning materials for this version

Rights

Atlas text and exercises: © Michael Reich. Third-party works are referenced bibliographically; their rights and access conditions apply separately. No blanket reuse permission for third-party texts.

Citation of this version

Michael Reich: Who may speak, and who is heard?. Atlas der Sprache / Atlas of Language. atlas-260-20261017-04, 2026-10-17. https://atlasoflanguage.com/editions/atlas-260-20261017-04/sprache-und-macht. Add access date. Versioned research edition. No DOI or external archival deposit is documented.