Explanation
The hypothesis that habitual linguistic distinctions can influence attention, memory, or categorisation. It makes language visible as one participant in thought rather than a transparent container for it.
Example
The concept becomes visible in use and can be followed as a movement of interpretation.
Counterexample
Influence is not deterministic imprisonment; speakers can learn and form new distinctions.
Distinction
Influence is not deterministic imprisonment; speakers can learn and form new distinctions.
Effect on thought and perception
It makes language visible as one participant in thought rather than a transparent container for it.
Resonance
It makes language visible as one participant in thought rather than a transparent container for it.
Cite this entry
Reich, Michael (Hrsg./ed.): „Linguistic relativity“. Atlas der Sprache, AT-PHI-0002. ATLAS 251, data model 1.6.0. https://atlasoflanguage.com/concept/AT-PHI-0002The address remains stable; editorial content may evolve. A verified modification date per entry is not yet available. Include your access date for precise references.